Details

MSc Output 4

MSc Output 4 Overview

1. Complex Worldviews & Animal Agriculture

1. Complex Worldviews & Animal Agriculture

2. Survey & Analysis of Strategies confronting Animal Oppression

2. Survey & Analysis of Strategies confronting Animal Oppression

3. Movements for Food System Change & Patterns of Oppression

3. Movements for Food System Change & Patterns of Oppression

4. Towards an Anarchist Agroecology

4. Towards an Anarchist Agroecology

Reflections

Reflections

Output Outcomes

Output Outcomes

Supporting Material

Supporting Material

Guidelines for the Reader

Please use the tabs along the top of the page to navigate.

All links are optional reading unless otherwise stated. Please dive in and out at your own leisure and interest. Please note all links will open into a new tab on your browser or a new window.

The 'Xmind' elements, which look like mind maps are best read by clicking the 'full screen' button which will open them in a new tab in your web browser, which you can then use your mouse to drag and move them around to read all the text.

All of the quotes are not included in the wordcount.

The references and resources for each page are detailed at the bottom of the page, apart from page three, where the resources are coupled with page four (as they influenced both pieces of work). There is also a summarised resource review in the supporting material section.

Please note pages 1 - 4 are the main pages of the report, most of interest to those not in the Gaia University system.

Wordcounts

Overview
Abstract - 336 words
Design methodology - 115 words (not incl. Mindmap)
Action learning processes - 336

Complex worldviews
2317 words

Survey & Analysis
82 words not including mindmap

Movements for Change
441 not included

Towards an anarchist agroecology
834

Total = 4461 words (3600 guided amount)

Creative Commons license

Output Overview

Welcome to my fourth output packet. I am a pre-capstone, MSc Open Topic associate with Gaia University, with a strategic focus on political agroecology.

The original aim of this output was to explore the histories, impacts and consequences of animal agriculture and explore what tools, methodologies and approaches are being used to end animal oppression, evaluate their effectiveness and explore what an antispeciest agroecology could look like and how it could be achieved.

The output is a based on period of time, integrating all of my work during this period between April and December 2014. However I draw on action learning experience and personal observations from the last 16 years in the animal liberation movement.

 

Abstract

 

This output packet is a container for my learning in these areas and the following pages include:

  • Output overview - An overview of the aims of the output, how it was designed and the various methodologies I used.
  • Reflections - This is the commentary on my work; my personal reflections of what I learnt creating this output and how it relates to my life and learning pathway in Gaia University.
  • Output Outcomes - The personal, professional, project, peer and political outcomes of my work during this output period.
  • Supporting Material - A broad container of links to resources used and further evidence, including course and workshop designs, learning journal entries and more.  

Output Design Methodology

This output was originally designed in this format here as part of my Learning Intentions Pathway Design in March 2013. Following a dynamic learning pathway, it was re-designed at the start of April 2014 in the below format:

 

Critical Evaluation in this Output

A large theme of this output is critically evaluating the fields I work within, most notably, the animal liberation movement. I drew guidance from the Gaia University orientation material and various sources about how to develop critical thinking skills.

I evaluated my own prejudices and worldviews around animal-human relations, so that I could identify my weaknesses in thinking critically.

A mindmap detailing my critical evaluation processes can be seen below:

 

Action Learning Processes

In designing this output, I utilised the principles of Kolb’s Experiential Learning Theory. Following an advising session with Jennifer English, I embraced this framework to ensure my learning and research were nested within a recognised action learning model:

  • Concrete experience: Active involvement in various social movements and struggles, from which I draw my observations and understanding. The practice of developing my workers cooperative Feed Avalon, establishing Brook End (land based project and demonstration centre) and more. Evidence of this concrete experience is abundant in my output outcomes section.
  • Reflective observation: I tracked my observations of interacting with different fields through the output 4 tracker form below. The results of which can be found on this spreadsheet here. I also drew on historical reflections gained through concrete life experience.
  • Abstract conceptualisation: I undertook a review of literature to draw on theories, models, worldviews and opinions of others in the fields I operate within. These concepts contributed to the transformation of previously held beliefs and opinions, as well as the dynamic generation of new ideas and models.
  • Active experimentation: Throughout this output period I was constantly testing new theories and ideas, that had been gained through processing my observations and reading materials of influence. For example, re-prioritising projects in my life, introducing new ideas to my workers cooperative, or designing and facilitating workshops. An example is the Animal Liberation & Land Struggle Workshop at the UK Animal Rights gathering, where many worldviews are quite ‘fixed’ to actively see the receptivity of new ideas within the movements and fields I engage with.


The reason I chose this model is because I find singular learning styles oppressive and ineffective. By embracing the totality of my own learning - combining rich, practical life experiences, with the intellectual cultivation of reading diverse literature that challenges and stretches me, as well as embracing collaboration, seeking of mentors and active experiments putting theory into practice - I develop ideas, models and proposals grounded in praxis and support my own personal transformation and growth.

A deep gratitude to Gaia University for its innovative embrace of action learning and the liberating structure it has created in my life.

Comments

Nicole Vosper
27 December 2014, 7:23 PM
My self review is attached.

Amber Marraudino
08 January 2015, 10:57 PM

Jennifer English Morgan
09 April 2015, 5:04 PM

Pro Review

3 comments